<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="/stylesheets/rss.css"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/">
  <channel>
    <title>Pither.com: Sleeping in two</title>
    <link>http://www.pither.com/articles/2007/10/16/sleeping-in-two</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <ttl>40</ttl>
    <description>by Simon Pither, freelance developer and systems administrator</description>
    <item>
      <title>Sleeping in two</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;For a long time I have been intrigued by the idea of getting more out of each day.  More waking (and productive) time.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I have looked at &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polyphasic_sleep"&gt;polyphasic sleep&lt;/a&gt; especially the most famous form, &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uberman%27s_sleep_schedule"&gt;Uberman's sleep&lt;/a&gt;,  on several occasions in the past.  However it has never really been practical for me to try it out.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Sadly this is still the case, but the slightly less ambitions biphasic sleep sounds like it might be possible.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The basic plan is to get a 1.5 hour nap at some point during the day (most details I can find suggest early evening) and then a 4.5 or 6 hour main sleep at some point during the night.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;For some years now it has been quite common for me to only get 6 hours sleep or less on several nights a week.  However I would always catch up by sleeping half of the weekend.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;As a relatively new parent, the extra weekend sleep is no longer possible and my regular nightly sleep is still only a maximum of 6 (or on a really good night 7) hours.  Plus with this now being our 10th month of parenthood, sleep deprivation is kicking in to help make a good portion of that sleep restless and less effective.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So if I can take my existing sleep time (6 hours) and transform it from "always over tired bad sleep" into "good sleep" simply by splitting it into a 1.5 hour nap and a 4.5 hour night, it sounds ideal.  Further more as I'm already sleep deprived, it shouldn't even be too hard to get into.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So I have a plan, now to see if it works!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Today was my first attempt at taking an afternoon nap.  I picked a time in late afternoon/early evening (which seems to be most popular) that I hoped would cause the least disruption to both my work and Liz/Edward.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This is what I've learnt:-&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;it's difficult getting to sleep with a baby shouting in the background, even if someone else if looking after them&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;in a house this small, even this fairly non-disruptive time is actually quite disruptive&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;to use an alarm clock that actually goes off&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;that laying down for 1.5 hours is not the same as getting 1.5 hours of sleep&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I'm hoping to change a number of these points (especially the last) by adapting my plan slightly.  Tomorrow I will try out taking my 1.5 hour sleep during an extended lunch break.  While I can't guard against screaming babies, hopefully this will be a less likely time of day for disruptions.  It's just a bit different to most other accounts I've found of biphasic sleeping.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So with about 30 minutes of nap sleep this afternoon, it's now ~1am and time for me to get to bed.  For tonight the plan is a 6 hour sleep.  I will reduce to 4.5 hours once the 1.5 hour sleeps are in place and working.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 23:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:88438f33-3d8e-46f4-b48b-c86e49df8e78</guid>
      <author>Simon</author>
      <link>http://www.pither.com/articles/2007/10/16/sleeping-in-two</link>
      <category>sleep</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
